- Founding Journey
- Posts
- Don't Settle for "Kind of Works"
Don't Settle for "Kind of Works"
And why VC funding is consolidating
Hey y’all — happy new year!
If you’ve been getting emails from Stripe about a BOI report and aren’t sure what it is or what to do, my friends at Pilot are offering Stripe Atlas customers a 100% free no-strings-attached filing.
I did it myself just to get it out of the way and you can here.
This isn’t an ad, I just was personally confused by these emails (Pilot’s blog shows that the courts have been going back and forth on whether it should be required) so I wanted to share with y’all.
Anyway, here’s today at a glance:
Opportunity → IMDB for Tech
Framework → Barrels & Ammunition
Tool → Stackfix
Trend → VC Fund Consolidation
Quote → “Kind of Works”
PS — Become a member to get access to my founder membership including an engaged community, fundraising support, fireside chats and more.
🔗 Houck’s Picks
My favorite finds of the week.
Fundraising
Growth
ICYMI
New Case Studies
Common Paper ($7M raised) → Insights from a 2x exited founder now building his third company.
Encast ($2.9M raised) → How a founder raised his round after 1 conversation
Get full access to our library of 80+ case studies here. It’s growing every week.
💡 Opportunity: IMDB for Tech
When I was working in big tech, a friend told me about this interesting hiring site called KeyValues where companies could detail what their engineering culture was actually like, in ways you couldn’t easily do on a JD.
It never became huge but I heard it was doing six figures of revenue at one point (maybe it still is). However, everyone I knew who had heard of the site loved it because it was a source of truth for information they couldn’t get anywhere else.
This week’s opportunity could be similar: highly niche, but valuable.
With resumes there’s a sort of unspoken rule that you can frame things in a way that veers into exaggeration, as long as you don’t outright lie.
Even some big creators do this with their public persona.
Getting a source of truth about who worked on what would be valuable for hiring decisions.
There are real challenges here, though.
That information is locked up in people’s heads and companies codebases. So there are only three ways to get it:
Incentivize people to give you accurate data about what their coworkers built
Incentivize companies to let you scan their codebases and employee directories to see who built what
It would need to be a labor of love, as both of those are very hard (and maybe impossible) asks to make.
But if it came together, the industry would thank (and pay) you.
🧠 Framework: Barrels and Ammunition
10x employees are real.
And rare.
And when you find them, you quickly realize they have a ton of leverage over you as a founder.
Keith Rabois says they’re like the barrels of a gun, and everyone else you hire are the ammunition that gets fired out of the barrel.
🛠 Tool: Stackfix
There are so many tools out there.
And Ai is letting people create new ones faster and faster.
Vertical SaaS is getting even more verticalized.
Stackfix is a way to identify specifically which CRM, or project management tool, or AI notetaker is right for you (among other things).
Pretty straightforward way to get real side-by-side comparisons.
📈 Trend: VC Fund Consolidation
Venture capital is a game of power laws, where one winning company can return the entire fund.
So why shouldn’t the venture industry itself behave this way?
The biggest venture funds are getting bigger faster than new funds are being started.
This makes sense — GPs (who deploy capital from funds) build trust with LPs (whose capital is invested in the funds) over time.
If you were investing a venture fund, one of the riskiest asset classes there is, wouldn’t you feel more comfortable giving your investment to someone who has already successfully found 10 unicorns?
Even among the $48 billion raised by top 30 firms there’s a power law, with the top 5 raising half of that.
What does this mean?
Well, for founders it means ironically that smaller funds may be less willing to take “risks.”
They’d rather co-invest with the big guys, as they can pitch that to LPs when they go out to raise their next fund.
Overall that doesn’t feel like a healthy component of the ecosystem, but it is what we’re seeing right now.
During the ZIRP era this wasn't the case, but with interest rates still high and no clear end in sight, founders should expect this trend to continue in 2025.
💬 Quote: “Kind of Works”
It’s the last day of 2024.
Tomorrow’s a new year.
You might be expecting me to say that it’s time to start something if you’ve been holding off.
But the point I think it more important to make is to existing founders:
If you’re working on something and investing your blood, sweat, and tears into it but it isn’t growing — consider moving on.
This isn’t a bad thing.
Founders are the engines that create prosperity in society.
The more successful your startup is, the more you’re doing to help others.
Ego, or the sunk cost fallacy, can get in the way of knowing when the right time to move on is.
But I would say to you to make sure you’re focused on delivering value in 2025. Make sure you’re building something people want.
How We Can Help
Become a member to get full access to our case study library, private founder community, and more.
We can also help your startup in a few other ways:
Content CreationLet my team and I ghostwrite for your newsletter, X, or LinkedIn. | Audience BuildingGrow your audience + generate leads with my growth service. |
FundraisingShare your round with hundreds of investors in my personal network. | AdvisingI’ll help solve a specific challenge you’re facing with your startup. |
Advertise in this newsletter to get in front of 60,000+ founders.
“*” indicates sponsored content.
Reply